DRI Methodology

The Displacement Risk Index (DRI) is a composite score (0–100) measuring the probability and velocity of AI-driven displacement for a given occupation. Higher scores indicate greater near-term risk.

CALCULATION FORMULA
DRI = (
  0.25 × Task_Repeatability +
  0.20 × Data_Availability +
  0.25 × AI_Capability_Match +
  0.20 × Adoption_Velocity −
  0.10 × Human_Value_Premium
) × 100

Each factor is scored 0–100 based on normalized data from the sources below. Scores are updated quarterly as new data becomes available.

Factor Definitions

Task Repeatability

Weight: 25%

How much of the role involves repeating defined tasks with predictable inputs and outputs. Derived from O*NET task taxonomy and McKinsey occupational mapping.

Data Availability

Weight: 20%

Degree to which the occupation's core workflows operate on digitized, structured data accessible to AI systems. Roles working with analog or highly contextual data score lower.

AI Capability Match

Weight: 25%

Current and projected AI model capabilities against the core competencies required by the occupation. Evaluated against SWE-bench, MMLU, and domain-specific benchmarks.

Adoption Velocity

Weight: 20%

Speed at which AI automation tools are being deployed in this occupational category. Tracked via BLS hiring trends, Challenger Gray layoff reports, and earnings call AI mentions.

Human Value Premium

Weight: 10%

Degree to which clients, employers, and society specifically require human judgment, empathy, physical presence, or accountability. Acts as a protective offset against the other risk factors.

Risk Level Definitions

F / DDRI 80–100
Critical Risk

Active displacement underway. Expect significant role restructuring within 2–3 years. Immediate transition planning recommended.

CDRI 60–79
High Risk

Accelerating automation pressure. Core tasks are being automated. Upskilling in AI-adjacent areas is urgent.

BDRI 40–59
Moderate Risk

Structural change likely by 2028–2030. Human premium exists but is narrowing. Strategic adaptation advised.

ADRI 0–39
Low Risk

Strong human premium. AI augments rather than displaces. Resilience through 2030+ is likely for current practitioners.

Data Sources

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Occupational employment statistics, task definitions via O*NET, and salary benchmarks
Challenger Gray & Christmas
Monthly job cut announcements including AI-attributed layoff data
World Economic Forum
Future of Jobs Report 2025 — occupational displacement forecasts and skill trends
McKinsey Global Institute
Automation potential by occupation and economic displacement modeling
Goldman Sachs Research
AI labor market impact study (2024) — occupational exposure estimates
Company Earnings Calls
Quarterly transcripts from S&P 500 companies for AI automation mentions by function
AI Benchmark Reports
SWE-bench, MMLU, HumanEval, and domain-specific AI capability assessments
LinkedIn Economic Graph
Hiring trend data and job posting volume by occupation

Limitations & Caveats

DRI scores reflect task-level automation potential, not individual worker outcomes. Highly skilled practitioners in displaced occupations often successfully transition.

Regional variation is significant. Displacement rates in major metro areas can differ substantially from rural markets for the same occupation.

DRI scores are updated quarterly based on available research. Rapid AI capability changes (e.g., a major new model release) may cause scores to change significantly between updates.

Occupations with DRI < 40 still face AI augmentation pressure. 'Low risk' does not mean 'no change' — it means human practitioners retain clear value advantages.

Employer restructuring decisions involve financial, political, and organizational factors beyond AI capability alone. High DRI scores indicate elevated risk, not certainty of displacement.